Legal notice
MIT for the files. Nobody’s endorsement for the name.
This is a personal project: four Markdown files and a site describing them. Nothing is sold here, nothing is installed, and nothing in the repository runs. What follows is the short version of who publishes it, what you may do with it, and what it isn’t.
Who publishes this
Patrik Repkovský, an individual in Slovakia, publishing a personal project rather than operating a business. There is no company, no registration number and no commercial offering behind this site. Contact details live at patrikrepkovsky.dev. Anything about the skills themselves is better off in the repository’s issues, where the answer stays readable to whoever asks next.
How the site handles personal data — briefly: it doesn’t — is set out in the privacy notice.
Not affiliated with Anthropic
The most important line on the page, which is why it is not at the bottom of it.
Claude and Claude Code are products of Anthropic PBC, and the names are theirs. This site is independent: not made by Anthropic, not endorsed by them, not reviewed by them, and not connected to them in any way. The skills are Markdown files written by one person to be read by a tool that Anthropic builds. That is the whole of the relationship.
Where their trademarks appear here it is to say what these files are for — the only reason a name like that ought to appear on somebody else’s site. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
What you may do with it
Two different answers, because the files and the site are two different things.
The skills are MIT licensed. Copy them, change them, rename them, fold them into something commercial — no permission to ask for and no attribution to chase. The licence text travels with the repository and it, not this paragraph, is what governs the files. The contributions page covers sending changes back, which is welcome and not required.
This website is not part of that grant. Its prose, illustrations, layout and source are © 2026 Patrik Repkovský, all rights reserved. That is the default rather than a position: ask if you want to reuse a piece of it and the answer is very likely yes.
No warranty, and why it matters here
A skill is a set of instructions handed to a language model, and a model’s output is not deterministic. Nothing here promises that a given run produces a given result, that the result is correct, or that following a procedure makes what comes out fit for any particular purpose. Read what it gives you before you ship it.
The MIT licence says the same thing in capitals: the software is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and no author is liable for any claim or damage arising from it. To the extent the law allows, that covers this site and everything published on it as well.
The example reports
Real runs, published unedited — which is the point of them, and also the thing worth being clear about.
Some of them discuss sites and products belonging to other people: a weather app, a gym-operations product, a placeholder domain. Each one summarises what was publicly served at that address on the day the run happened, and quotes only as much as it takes to show what was found. Names, marks and screenshots in them belong to their owners, and appear as description rather than as any claim on them.
What a report says is an example of what a skill produces. It is not a verified statement about anybody’s business, not an audit, and not advice — and it goes out of date from the moment it is written, because nothing here is re-run to keep it current. The research reports are the same: sourced and dated at the time, not maintained since.
If something in a report is about you and you would rather it weren’t, or you think it gets something wrong, open an issue or use the contact above. It comes down or gets corrected; there is no case to argue.
Last updated 28 August 2026